Meet Me In Denver!

Cross-posted at Hillary's Bloggers

Just know this - I'm not gonna stop as long as she's out there fighting for us.  As long as she's standing up for us - I'm standing up for her.  Get it?

I've been on the blogs every day since last June, fighting the good fight for Hillary and her herstoric run for the White House, and I've taken a lot of sh#t from Obama's followers for my efforts.  So much so that I was forced to choose between my sanity and blogging over at dKos.  It got so bad that I walked out over the abusive bs there (along with a boatload of other bloggers).   So I have to wonder how Camp Obama thinks they're going to make nice with me and Hillary's other online supporters after the way they've treated us for the past 6 months or more.  Does he really think this sudden concern about unity - this sudden effort to make nice will undo all the damage that's been done during the course of this campaign?

We've been called Rovian.
Repukes.
Republicans.
Red-Staters.
Fascists.
Corporatists.
Racists.
Hate-mongers.
Liars.
Traitors...

I could go on all night with the list.

We've also been treated to some of the most sexist and dismissive bs I've ever seen, and have watched as Camp Obama's followers suggested that others dig up real life information on us and our families - to what end I don't know.

Don't get me wrong - I'm all for getting along with other Democrats, but you can probably see how laughable we think this sudden effort is after all that's happened.

A post over at the Lavender Newswire (from May 12th) pretty much sums it up for me...

Notice something? For about three days after his supporters declared Barack Obama the "presumptive nominee" (the DNC didn't; Obama himself didn't; his supporters did), the constant bashing of us non-believers and calls to banish us (and Hillary) from the Democratic Party (and maybe even the planet), forever, suddenly subsided, to be replaced by sickeningly cloying calls for "unity" and "graciousness," 'cause, after all, "we're all Democrats."

This, non-believers, is how stupid the Obamabots really think we are.

It was as if The Big Giant Head at Obama Central texted new marching orders to the cell phones (or perhaps directly into the brain-chip implants) of all Obamaniacs simultaneously, and that message went something like this: "OMFG REDID DA MATH: WE FD UP. 86 OPERATION HRC BASH IMMED PROCEED W/OPERATION MAKE NICEY NICE ASAYGT. ACK."

(Ok I included that bit because of the last part in caps)

I mention all this because I want to make something absolutely clear here on the blogs...

There is no way in HELL I'm giving up on Hillary - if she's in this and standing tall then I'm going to be standing right by her side, fighting the good fight on the blogs.  Anyone who's read my stuff over the past year will get a sense as to just how passionate I am about helping her make it to the White House - for more reasons than I could count at this point.  From her 35 years of dedicated public service and focus on families like mine - helping working folks - kids with special needs - universal healthcare - showing girls and young women just what a woman can accomplish if she works hard, knows her stuff and shows up day after day after day to do the next right thing - gang it all adds up to a candidate worth fighting for.

I don't know her personally but I think I've learned enough about her strength and character over the past year to know that she's not one who gives up easily.  As long as there's a chance for her to accomplish what she set out to do - to help others and make a positive difference in our lives - then she's going to continue taking her case to the voters and the superdelegates out there.  As Bill's said of her many times - there's no quit in that girl.

I have no doubt that she's in this thing through to the convention.  She understands that nothing's set in stone until the votes are cast on the convention floor, and a LOT can happen between now and Denver.

If he declares victory on May 20th I'll be the first to call bullshit on his stunt.

She now has the lead and she'll finish the primaries with a lead in the popular vote.

The delegates from Florida and Michigan will be seated (hopefully at full strength).  There's no way Dean will convene a Democratic Party convention with only 48 states represented, especially after making a huge effort to push his 50-state strategy.

She'll make her case to the superdelegates out there that she's our strongest candidate going up against McCain in the general election, and I'm convinced she'll win them over on that point.

And we'll all meet up in Denver in August.

Hillary and I are cut from the same cloth gang.  There's no quit in me either.

I'm in this through our convention and on to November.  You dig? ;o)

One last point - I do this for free.  It's called volunteering yeah?  Hillary's team is made up of thousands of volunteers and we all do what we can with the time, talent and resources we have at our disposal.  Nobody needs to pay me to sing Hillary's praises here on the blogs, over the phone or face to face with my neighbors, friends and family.

And by the way - that title???  It's just a title.  Like many of Hillary's supporters I can't afford to attend a convention like this.  Hotels and airfare are beyond my reach so I'll be watching it on the teevee from home.  But I'll be there with you all in spirit.



Display:


Repeat? (2.00 / 10)

Didn't TD already beat you to this particular line of attack diary today?


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:47:55 PM EST

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 17)

She's in it to win it - and so am I!


Donate to Hillary Now!
by alegre on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:48:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And No - It's Not A Repeat (2.00 / 12)

Read them both and you'll know :)


Donate to Hillary Now!
by alegre on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:49:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And No - It's Not A Repeat (2.00 / 2)

Oh right, you simply added a few more unfounded smears from unreputable blogs ;-)


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:50:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Did You Read Past the First Paragraph? (2.00 / 10)


Donate to Hillary Now!
by alegre on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:52:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes (2.00 / 2)

But I dare not share my true feelings because I enjoy being able to rec and rate


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:55:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Welcome To My World (2.00 / 9)


Donate to Hillary Now!
by alegre on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:58:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (1.70 / 10)

Oh, I know. You have to face so much adversity on this site. Hell, I mean you throw an accusation out there like Obama hiring 400 bloggers, and as evidence, offer a blog that cites another blog that cites... nothing... for evidence.

Awesome journalism. Using this logic, remind me why we decided you weren't getting paid by Clinton? Besides the fact she's broke?


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:21:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (2.00 / 4)

rage, why is this a big deal what is the nerve she's hit. There was a diary summoning her to the inquisition, she's accused of being a paid blogger at least ten times a day, what is your problem?  I have to tell you, this over reaction makes you look suspicious.  You'd think she said he's slapped four hundred puppies, for heaven's sake.  What gives?  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:25:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (2.00 / 2)

Because, we just had this argument. Someone accused her of being a paid blogger, and we had this righteous indignation from Alegre, oh, how dare you, my family, blah blah blah, etc, etc, and here's she's spreading the same sort of bullshit- with exactly zero evidence. Hell, the site she gave claims to cite FOX News- a bastion of journalistic integrity- but instead, it cites another blog. Which then cites nothing, no source this information came from whatsoever. And 400 bloggers? Give me a break. The number "400" is just used in a vain attempt to make it seem like more concrete or real information.

Alegre claims to be passionate about Clinton; fine, I can dig that. And there's plenty of Obama supporters who are just as vocal and passionate. To suggest someone's being paid detracts from that.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:31:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (2.00 / 5)

she accused no one personally, it isn't personal at all, the rumor is not central to her story other than she's tell Barack, and on behalf of quite a few I might add, that making nice is not just too late, it so's late it no longer matters. We're not on the same team and we won't be until the nominee is selected.  We don't support the same candidate.  We want to go to Denver because we think she's the best chance to beat McCain and will be the superior executive in executing plans and solutions. We're with her, and we're not bored, or tired, or in need of charming.  It could have been fun, but it hasn't been.  I'll support the nom, but until then I'm for taking it to Denver.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:50:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (2.00 / 1)

All these arguments you're making about unity, realize if somehow Clinton becomes the nominee in August in Denver, she has to reconcile the giant rift that will form in the party, campaign against McCain instead of Obama, and try to win an election in two months.

You're telling me it's too little, too late. Well, with that attitude, if you're counting on my support if Clinton takes this thing to the convention and somehow becomes the nominee, tough. Reconcile that one.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:59:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

he'll get my support if he's the nom.  What a goofy idea. I could possibly think it's important enough to fight into the convention, but if she lost I'd want McCain? Have you got a screw loose?  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:04:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

Very well, then, my bad. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem everyone shares your sentiments.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:17:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

Go Alegre. There are more than a few people here who are making it easier to believe the bought blogger rumours.


by ellend818 on Sat May 17, 2008 at 12:22:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

she accused no one personally, it isn't personal at all, the rumor is not central to her story other than she's telling Barack, and on behalf of quite a few I might add, that making nice is not just too late, it so late it no longer matters. We're not on the same team and we won't be until the nominee is selected.  We don't support the same candidate.  We want to go to Denver because we think she's the best chance to beat McCain and will be the superior executive in executing plans and solutions. We're with her, and we're not bored, or tired, or in need of charming.  It could have been fun, but it hasn't been.  I'll support the nom, but until then I'm for taking it to Denver.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:53:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (2.00 / 1)

It's just more unsubstantiated nonsense from her.  Like her diary a couple months a go when she showed Hillary would win the delegate race, and provided all the stats to PROVE it, but guess what, she had made all the stats up herself.  


by interestedbystander on Fri May 16, 2008 at 05:49:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

You're sooooo silly.  Algere is a blogger, but she's a huge target around here and they're still whining about her over at kos, or so I hear, I don't personally go there.  Stat's are all done like that, to make a case or show something is possible. What about all that 'it's the math' coming from the media, which math are they looking at, there are always more than a few ways to count.  Oh, well, why bother, you want to have some target, guess it's a working mother of two for you.


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 10:56:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

You obviously didn't read the diary - it was widely ridiculed at the time, even by the Hillary supporters.  The thing was, she didn't admit she had made the stats up, she was passing them off as polling data.


by interestedbystander on Fri May 16, 2008 at 04:19:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

Stat's are all done like that, to make a case or show something is possible.
This sentiment is part of the problem.  The 'lies, damn lies and statistics' line is true, but not because of a flaw with stats, but because so many are willing to abuse this science for the sake of deceiving others or themselves.  Properly done statistics is the sole method of proving things experimentally in many sciences.  A well-constructed statistical analysis from a clean dataset can reduce the amount of doubt clouding a situation to near zero.  It's true that there's always more than one way to look at data, but it's not true, as is often claimed, that you can prove anything with statistics.  The problem is that fallacious arguments are much harder for the untrained eye to spot when stats are employed, much as they would be if you made your argument in Greek.


by semiquaver on Fri May 16, 2008 at 07:59:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

so who's the authority?  Since there is none, I'd prefer to think for myself.  I don't need to get agreement, my opinions don't depend on support from other bloggers.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 09:34:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (none / 0)

I'm not exactly sure what you mean when you say 'who's the authority?'  Who's the authority when Democrats say "global warming is a reality"?  For that matter, who's the authority on whether boats can fall off the edge of the world if one sails too far?  

Some things are considered settled by science, and the very strong explanatory power of statistics when practiced responsibly is one of them.  Maybe as a trained statistician my bias is showing, but while in specific scenarios one should always be skeptical of statistical analysis, to mistrust it in general and doubt its ability to make strong conclusions is no different than mistrusting the veracity of evolution.  One should question individual purveyors of bad stats, rather than the field as a whole.  This isn't one blogger's opinion, this is the established consensus of science.

The bottom line is, there's only one political party dedicated to undermining science and I'm pretty sure it's not mine.


by semiquaver on Sat May 17, 2008 at 02:00:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (2.00 / 1)

No thanks.  I prefer the real one.


by JJE on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:53:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Go Cry, Emo Kid (1.00 / 2)


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:44:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Welcome To My World (2.00 / 4)

> the called us ....

The Buddha tells a story of a man walking down a path in a forest, two villages dispute ownership of the land and  someone fires an arrows at him which hits his arm.

He pulls out the arrow, he's wounded but not seriously. He's angry.
He takes the arrow home an put it in a velvet box by his computer (okay maybe this is an adaptation)

Then every day as he start blogging he recalls that arrow, takes it out and stabs himself with it. Arggggghhh, that hurts, that's what they did to me. And again he stabs himself, recollecting, bleeding.

Each day he end a bloody mess. And the hate grows.

Moral - you don't have to keep stabbing yourself with old arrows. It hurts, you mostly.  Throw the old arrows away. You have that choice.


by holder on Fri May 16, 2008 at 03:58:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes (2.00 / 2)

Hey Lost... why did you 0 my Huckabee remark? I was clearly being snarky.


by Tatan on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:58:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes (2.00 / 1)

I honestly don't remember. It was very possibly a mistake, where I selected the wrong box. If you could point me towards the comment I could check ;)


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:01:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes (2.00 / 2)

Found it... yep, that was a misfire on my part. Sorry about that, corrected. :)


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:02:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Thanks (2.00 / 1)

Yeah... I thought it was weird the you would zero me for that. I thought maybe my snark was lost on you. It's hard to tell parody from the real thing these days.


by Tatan on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:04:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks (2.00 / 1)

It gets lost sometimes, but I'm pretty sure that was an honest mistake, though. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Everyone needs mojo to go around :)


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:06:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Actually (2.00 / 3)

The 400 paid bloggers would not be a bad use of funds for the Obama camp. Clearly something needs to be done to mend fences, and god knows the Big Orange ain't gonna do it.


by OtherLisa on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:04:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually (none / 0)

They're not going to do that... the interwebs are a incredibly small and uniquely inhospitable place to try to sway anyone. No point in trying, better to cast a wide net by swaying the masses and in the process catch a few of the netizens.


by Tatan on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:07:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually (2.00 / 2)

Well, sad to say, but as a formerly tepid Hillary supporter, the hostility I personally encountered definitely had an effect - and probably not one that the Obama campaign likes to see.

But I do agree, obvious astroturfing isn't going to cut it.


by OtherLisa on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:10:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually (2.00 / 1)

The hostility came back from Clinton supporters just as hard, if not moreso. The problem is, of course, that Obama's winning; so the Clinton-supporters' hate is excusable, apparently.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:32:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually (2.00 / 1)

It's embarrassing. It makes them look like sore losers without a lick of sense. So when they ask for understanding or kindness before they'll vote for Obama, you'll have to excuse my lack of concern.

And yes, it's a free country. Everyone can vote for whoever they want. And ultimately we'll get the government we deserve.


by Rationalisto on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:52:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually (none / 0)

You can't hold the Obama campaign responsible for everyone on here. Just like I can't hold Hillary responsible for the crap I get from her supporters.


by Tatan on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:37:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Actually (2.00 / 3)

I don't, and I was not referring to this site in particular cough Big Orange cough

It simply has not been an even-handed phenomena. AmericaBlog, HuffPo, TPM, the list goes on and on.

Sure, there are a few very partisan HRC blogs. But the big ones I've mentioned are supposed to be broad-based, you know, representative of the Reality-based community, all that. The level of foaming rage at these places has been off the charts.

And unfortunately, to me, it's the same dynamic playing out in the MSM, and upward through the Democratic Party power structure. The stuff that's been said is really hard to get past or to forgive. Marie Coco's column sums it up nicely.

I started off the campaign as an Edwards supporter. My first clue that something was very wrong came during the New Hampshire debate. I could not believe the pile-on, and I was impressed by how HRC handled herself. That led to a greater investigation of her on my part.

By now I admit my emotions are frayed and fully engaged. I see things like that "Sweetie" clip and I wonder how I will ever make myself vote for this man. It feels like insult on top of injury on top of insult.

I have a lot of more policy-based reasons why I don't care for Obama but I'd be lying if I said it wasn't personal, at this point.


by OtherLisa on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:55:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And No - It's Not A Repeat (none / 0)

OK ... Fess up. Who is making the big $$.


Wisdom Is The Reward For Listening Over A Lifetime
by gunner on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:13:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I am getting (2.00 / 1)

a whopping -$65 dollars from him this year (how much I donated to him) I got from Edwards -$50 (how much I donated to him).

Al Franken gave me -$20
Don Cazuyoux gave me -$5
The DNC gave me -$10
Scott Kleeb gave me -$5

Mr. Boccieri running in OH-16 will be giving me -$5 once I get some money, Kleeb with me giving me more -$, so will the DNC, and probably Obama.

(the - values are donations I haven't gotton anything except a letter from Don thanking me for the donation).


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:34:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I am getting (2.00 / 1)

You're raking it in.

Barack Obama has given me -$534 since the beginning of the campaign. But I get the feeling I'll be getting another paycheck from him pretty soon.


by Tatan on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:39:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You should also receive some (none / 0)

money from the down ballot candidates you like, just because you like Obama doesn't mean you shouldn't rake in the -$ from them too.

(if you have that is wonderful) but I know a senate candidate from NE (Kleeb) or MN (Franken) that are deserving, same with some house candidates (Darcy Burner)


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:03:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You should also receive some (2.00 / 1)

Oh I've been collecting little checks from all of them. Every little bit helps, I've got a busy Obama-blogger sweatshop to run here.


by Tatan on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:18:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

400 Bloggers? (2.00 / 3)

Did they bring ponies?????


by OtherLisa on Thu May 15, 2008 at 11:59:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 400 Bloggers? (2.00 / 1)

ponies with horns is unicorns!


Unseen, in the background, Fate was quietly slipping the lead into the boxing glove.
by fogiv on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:35:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 4)

Hi Algere, you've been famous today, someone wanted to sucker you into some endless discussion.

Isn't it amazing, that anyone could think we're subject to easy blogger charm and would go panting after Barack, once we'd been properly charmed. If it weren't so childish it'd be offensive.  I for one am looking forward to the convention.  I don't see either of them just giving up, after putting so much heart and soul and having so many passionate and committed, dare i say convicted, supporters.  Anyway, it's fun.  Very engaging. I'm looking forward to blogging for her in the GE.  I can't wait to see them debate.  She'll smile and nod him into circles, he'll end up conceding.  She has a kind of hypnotic effect on her fellow debaters, they kind of blither, have you noticed?  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:01:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 2)

There's no right thing to do here.  If we argue, we get "where's the unity?  Well, start uniting?"  So we're nice.  Apparently that's offensive too.

So I'll be frank - you need to feel angry because it's the only way to continue on with what is so obviously a losing cause.  There's nothing in the world anyone outside your head can do that's going to affect you one way or the other - although you'll claim that you've been "put off" for this and a million other things that haven't happened yet.

Alegre tipped her hand in a huge way during the Indiana primary - she said that if Obama ended up winning, it was because there was fraud in Gary.  But only if he won.  She didn't see how insane that is.


Unable to rec or rate. But I've got phantom mojos for miles.
by Agent77 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:08:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Excuse Me? (1.87 / 8)

Insane?

So much for playing nice.

And for the record - I never said you shouldn't try to be civil.  I just said it's too little too late when it comes to winning us over.


Donate to Hillary Now!
by alegre on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:16:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excuse Me? (none / 0)

Playing nice is "insulting and condescending" apparently.


Unable to rec or rate. But I've got phantom mojos for miles.
by Agent77 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:20:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You present rumors as fact (2.00 / 2)

and try to use it against Obama and you expect US to play nice?

What if I came out and tried to insinuate that Hillary killed Vincent Foster because some people said so and she shouldn't be President because she's a murderer who belongs in jail.

Of course I wouldn't do that, but I hardly expect you to respond nicely if I did.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:21:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excuse Me? (none / 0)

"Go ahead and be civil, but it's irrelevant to us."

The poster you are responding to is correct, and you admit it with your post above. Your change, if any, must come from within. Pointing the finger at others serves only as an excuse for you to shirk your own responsibility for your thoughts and feelings.

You own your feelings and your thoughts. Nobody else does.



McCain
by Black Anus on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:14:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excuse Me? (none / 0)

"Go ahead and be civil, but it's irrelevant to us."

The poster you are responding to is correct, and you admit it with your post above. Your change, if any, must come from within. Pointing the finger at others serves only as an excuse for you to shirk your own responsibility for your thoughts and feelings.

You own your feelings and your thoughts. Nobody else does.



McCain
by Black Anus on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:15:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 3)

lighten up, even if it's true, it's funny.  This isn't a rumor that can hurt anyone.  It's okay to have paid bloggers, just not secret ones.  If we ask, they'd have to say, like cops. Finally a little levity and it's taken as a smear? Silly you.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:17:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 3)

I don't think it's cute or funny, or healthy, actually, to systematically see the worst in people because it helps you go on.


Unable to rec or rate. But I've got phantom mojos for miles.
by Agent77 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:21:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 2)

paid bloggers are professionals, they wouldn't get sucked into this diary. She didn't call anyone out, that's what's against the rules, no one here has been accused of anything, and i don't think there would be grounds for a duel if someone in bar fight called the other one a paid blogger. She's personally accused all the time, but this diary accuses no one.  How touchy you are all, what's that about?  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:39:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 2)

Well she's calling us all out by implication, slandering her political opponents, and producing no evidence.

Just imagine if the tables were turned how you would react.  You are not stupid, so don't pretend to be.


Unable to rec or rate. But I've got phantom mojos for miles.
by Agent77 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:48:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 2)

no she isn't. Have you any idea how narcissistic that sounds? And the 'paid bloggers, if they ever show up, shall be known by their charm.'   Have you noticed any new and delightfully charming Barack bloggers?  I haven't.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:01:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 1)

Well, I joined recently, and I happen to think I'm charming. :)


Stop the racism. Fight the smears.
by CrazyDrumGuy on Fri May 16, 2008 at 03:16:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (none / 0)

charm is judged by the charmed, not by the wanna be charmer.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 10:52:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (none / 0)

Yowch! I need to be more careful with humor, apparently.


Stop the racism. Fight the smears.
by CrazyDrumGuy on Sun May 18, 2008 at 11:40:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 1)

It's the bad faith and the cynical motives that bother me.  It's a slur on the campaign and people who are associated with it.

It's also, I believe, designed to make it difficult for people to be nice to each other.


We should be able to deliver bottled hot water to dehydrated babies.
by Jess81 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:10:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

"ask, they'd have to say, like cops."{ (2.00 / 1)

Urban legend.

The prisons are full of people who asked "Are you a cop" before consumateing dope deals.




Democratic Candidate, US Senate, Wisconsin 2012
by benmasel on Fri May 16, 2008 at 02:17:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 1)

Obviously the voters didn't...


Obama supporter who is damn glad Hillary Clinton is a Democrat!!
by hootie4170 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:10:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Um, No (2.00 / 7)

Not an endless discussion.  The diarist wanted Alegre to understand that some people might honestly believe NARAL has a right to support Obama.  Fat chance.  I can tell you what Alegre believes: Alegre believes that it was perfectly fine for reproductive rights groups to endorse Clinton early, but not for NARAL to endorse Obama when it's clear to most that he's going to be the nominee.

Unfortunately, Alegre doesn't respond to things she doesn't agree with.  Alegre had dutifully passed along all the misrepresentations about Obama's "present" votes on reproductive issues and women's rights, then went on her merry way.  In re her Indiana diary, she smeared the mayor of Gary, then went on her merry way.  Later, she added an update chastising Obama supporters for being rude.

Here, she implies that many of the Obama supporters around here are being paid by the campaign--but she "honestly doesn't care" if they are or not.  

Makes me wonder if perhaps Alegre is being paid by the Clinton campaign to blog for her.  I honest don't care if she is or isn't, but it does make you wonder, doesn't it?  Then again, given that the Clinton campaign owes more than $11M, much of it to small businesses, perhaps it's more appropriate to speculate that Alegre is an unpaid blogger on behalf of Clinton.  

Note the new location for goalposts.  Because technically no delegates have cast ballots and won't until Denver, this race is essentially tied at 0 to 0.  And we won't know a thing until August.  And so much can happen between now and then!!  And if anyone in the Obama campaign or the media or the Democratic Party intrudes on this merry fantasy by pointing out that the parties always act based on the presumption of how delegates are going to vote, they'll be accused of trying to short-circuit the process and cheating Clinton.  Indeed, any superdelegate who endorses Obama, helping push him over 2024.5 or 2240 or whatever number is on the Clinton blackboard today, will be accused of trying to short-circuit the process.


by deminva on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:27:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Is Alegre a paid blogger? (none / 0)

One wonders.


No Quacks, please.
by noquacks on Fri May 16, 2008 at 10:29:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I doubt she's being paid (none / 0)

Remember back in February, some were going without pay due to the campaign's finances. I doubt they'd pay for her writing anyway.

However, that's not to say she's not coordinating with them. She's mentioned several times in diaries being privy to campaign discussions, so it's obvious she has access that others do not. I don't think it's crazy to assume that there is some level of discussion (probably very, very low) between the two.


by bookish on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:32:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Going on (none / 0)

I don't think anyone has the right to tell any candidate or their supporters to quit, and, believe it or not, I admire your passion for her, as I am able to admire her passion when it is, as it has been of late, about what she can do and not what he is lacking.

I hope, when this is over, and if, that is if, as I think he most likely will Obama wins, and if, as I am sure she would, Hillary Clinton does her absolute best to see a Democrat in the White House, that you can move past some of his uglier supporters and back to what the party can bring to this country.

I would not ever tell anyone who to vote for, that's not the point of this, just an apology for some of the more arrogant Obama people, and a plea to at least look at his candidacy with an open mind if it comes to that.  I do understand that there are people who will not be able to do this (again if it comes to that), but I hope they are few.  This has less to do with making sure my guy gets elected, but rather trying to forge some kind of community of Democrats again.


by mady on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:09:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 8)

Nice comment and had it been made months ago I would join you in the "unity".  I begged for just that, just some mutual respect, on Kos for months and was verbally assualted and told I hadn't died soon enough.  So forgive my skeptism - especially on a day when word is out that team Obama has directed bloggers to tone down their rhetoric against Hillary.  For me, it's too little and too damn late.


by Tolstoy on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:18:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 4)

Let me just ask, who in their right mind would vote based on the people they encounter on a message board?  Do you understand how truly silly that is?


by rfahey22 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:22:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 3)

I assure you I am in my right mind and am seldom silly.  I did not say I based MY VOTE on what is said on these blogs.


by Tolstoy on Fri May 16, 2008 at 01:25:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Some Obama supporters are a new breed. (1.33 / 3)

Most women  learn about abusive men before they are even old enough to vote.  And by then many have a heightened awareness of abuse of power and injustice.

Some men learn these lessons early, too.  Whatever we though of Obama in the beginning, we came to be very disturbed about the changing behavior of people at the orange.  Often they were people we had read and interacted with for a long time, maybe admired.  Some had been in gatherings together in person.  We became alarmed when comments started being abusive.  I don't mean this hyper-thin-skinned, persecuted overreacting that is a regular feature of the campaign now.

 I don't mean the nothing stuff Obama supporters call abusive.  I mean real abuse.  Bullying taken to frightening extents.  Ganging up to beat down the writer.  Angry, destructive language, constant berating.  Diary hijacking that was instant and automatic and so thorough that the diarist would leave before anyone who had actually read the diary made a comment.  The harsh cruelty of the gang behavior was astonishing and very threatening.

Many, many diarists tried to reason with what used to be online friends,, tried to elevate the talk to actual discourse, tried to argue logical trains of thought.  All of this was destroyed in swooping attacks by a group who just filled up the space with mean, ugly, insulting garbage, berating and intimidating and demeeaning and dismissing.  It got worse after that.  But I doubt anyone who didn't see it there will agree that it happened.

There was one certain constant in who acted this way and who didn't.  Not all of the Obama supporters acted this way, some tried to stop it and fought hard against it for a while.

But every person who behaved in this horribly aggressive bullying abusive manner was saying they supported Senator Obama and the single factor that fit all of those being attacked was that they were all Hillary supporters OR asking questions to try to reconcile some concern about something Obama had said or done or inquire about qualifications and policies proposed or past record in order to decide which candidate to favor. ( There was a lot going on with Edwards supporters, but leave that aside here.)

Some members of the orange worked too many hours each day trying to offer a different voice, some information, some argument, some encouragement and also some support of other victims.

Alegre tried to put up a diary most every day as a different voice and we would all gather there in support.  But it was vicious and cruel and frightening what was coming from them, like a mania of some group of lost boys alone in the wild with no boundaries and no fear of predators, trying to out do each other with the next daring response.

Bizarre and so beyond anything healthy that we were all seeing how destructive it was to continue to expose ourselves to the abuse.  Still some stayed to support each other until Alegre had had enough and hundreds and hundreds left with her.

Other liberal blogs crashed over the next few days with way too much traffice as we all sought out new places to check in several times a day. People reorganized, added servers and added RULES.  It was an amazing, shocking relief to be able to carry on discussions, transfers of information, ruminations and disagreements in civil environments that weren't dangerous to visit.

You would be astonished at the number of people who decided against Senator Obama because of the actions of those supporters.  There were hundreds of thousands of people every day witnessing what they did to the Hillary supporters and to the people who had any questions about Obama.

How many times have we heard people say that they had been interested in Obama and had not felt that good about Hillary ...until they saw how Hillary supporters were being treated on the blog OR until they saw how Hillary (and Bill) were being treated by Obama and the campaign, compounded by so many in the media.

Hillary's support has defininately grown tremendously because of decisions of Obama folks to be abusive.

I'll give you one tiny, minute mild example of lack of civility.(not the heavy stuff)  After Hillary won West Virginia she spent a good chunk of the next day taping interviews with all of the news shows for TV, most of which would air at the evening news hour.  Then she was to meet with her  finance committee and some superdelegates to assess and plan.

She had just won by 41 points a huge victory for someone who's campaign had been universally declared dead and no longer counting the week before. Any worth competitor would have recognized and respected that win in those circumstances.

Senator Obama contacted all the news channels and evening news anchors and jtold them there was something really big coming up and that he wanted live camera setups at this huge rally he was holding in Michigan and that they would have to cut to their news broadcasts live.  He then brought out Edwards for his endorsement and both gave speeches carried on all the channels.

They had to bump all of the Hillary interviews about her big win and the rest of her campaign...her moment to bask and to frame where she goes from here, her chance to answer questions to quell the speculations that were passing for fact among pundits and 'reporters' like Lawrence ODonnel.

So she went into her meeting with supers and finance people with it all abuzz with Edwards' endorsement, the same Edwards who had just spent three days on tv  talking about why it would be wrong for him to endorse now and how important it was not to do it now.

Now this was not a big thing for Hillary to have to handle and go on and our girl is used to being treated this way and going on.  But I should tell the rest of us something important about Senator Obama and Senator Edwards.

They both know what they were doing was mean and unfair and dirty.  And they did it just because they could, thinking it would give them an extra advantage at Hillary's expense.  They got away with it.

But to women and a lot of men with a distaste for injustice and especially women too familiar with abusive behavior, this is a warning reminder of what we learned a the orange.  This is not a good man, not a fair or just man and he doesn't play by the rules and he encourages dangerous excuses like racism and sexism to blame some and win others.

 He has a history of taking other people's work and calling it his own and of taking credit for work he didn't do, and winning honors from people he won't contribute to and using power to help the powerful and taking currying favor and seeking help from people he then turns his back on to curry new favors from the other side.

 He whipped up the loyalty of the Black community more than almost anyone has and he won't give anything back.
He doesn't burn to serve or love the problem solving or feel the great needs and have great policies and programs springing from his deep caring. He buys and sells influence and power and many of the people who have helped him elevate have been lowered by him in return.

I think that the reason he only got 37% of the Black vote in Massachusetts is that they had already had a trial run with Gov. Deval Patrick, another David Axelrod client, who had the same message of "hope and change" and some of the same speeches, it turned out, and similar resume...not really qualified but sold as a fresh outsider to bring unity and change.  And the community embraced and elevated and supported Patrick.

Now most everybody is sorry.  He acts like he hates the work;he;s not good at it he whines about it and doesn't kknow how to fix things and make things happen and unity didn't happen after the speech.  Now the state is in buyer's remorse in a big way and the community is embarrassed.  When Barack Obama came to town with the same credentials and the same speech the Black community said a resounding "Hello, Hillary".

 All the senior politicians were for Obama but not the people.  The wanted someone who could do the work and sounded like she knoew how to do it and what the problems were and how to start fixing them.  The opposite of that plagerized speech Obama used.  The saw that they had been conned and they weren't buying twice.

Now most of the Hillary supporters I know and hear about are more for Hillary in proportion to the abuses of the Obama campaign on Hillary and the process. And to the abuses of the Obama supporters who have somehow be inspired, freed and unchecked by Obama to behave in such a way as to shut down and drive off and threaten any opposition.

So the answer is yes.


by itsadryheat on Fri May 16, 2008 at 08:33:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Some Obama supporters are a new breed. (2.00 / 1)

I cannot believe that you feel rolling out a big endorsement in response to a big primary win is somehow abusive.  It's called campaigning.  To call it abusive after Edwards spent upwards of 5 minutes praising Hillary during the endorsement is simply intellectually dishonest.

If you really want an example of a "lack of civility," look to Hillary herself.  When she lost Wisconsin you couldn't tell from her speeches that a primary had even taken place.  So much for thanking all those Hillary supporters who busted their asses for her in that state.  And Wisconsin was not the only state that she ignored entirely when she lost.

I won't bother with the rest of your comment, seeing as it is opinion based on conjecture, rather than an opinion based on fact.


by shalca on Fri May 16, 2008 at 10:04:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Some Obama supporters are a new breed. (none / 0)

I thought Edwards' effusive praise of Hillary was the most obvious suck-up I'd seen in a long time. Well, I'm "not ready to make nice".


by ellend818 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:08:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Suck-up for what purpose? (none / 0)

Hillary has nothing to offer Edwards.  He was trying to be gracious and help heal rifts, even though he didn't have to.

Hillary's campaign could learn from his gesture.  The few times I heard her say nice things about Obama were when she was boxed in to doing so.


by corph on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:44:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You're right; you didn't get the point or context! (none / 0)


by itsadryheat on Fri May 16, 2008 at 02:19:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Some Obama supporters are a new breed. (none / 0)

Thank you.  That comment is worthy of a rec list diary on its own.


by Tolstoy on Fri May 16, 2008 at 02:42:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Made my day. I did as you suggest. (none / 0)


by itsadryheat on Fri May 16, 2008 at 11:45:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Some Obama supporters are a new breed. (none / 0)

You've got to be joking about the "abusive" remarks?  My god, what the hell has this come to?  Poor little victims.....  Spare me and leave the histrionics at the door.  Comparing angry responses to a political blog to the scourge that is real violence against women is offensive and trivializes real abuse, the only thing I have to say is if you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.  
I don't know why I even want to bother to counter one on your points after that ridiculous "abusive" line, but perhaps if your observations were based on fact rather than innuendo;  the reason Obama did poorly in Massachusetts among African American is that the Black vote it Massachusetts is very centralized in a few districts in Mattapan and Hyde Park where Menino has the greatest political machine.  Menino by far is the most popular politician in the whole Boston metro area, more popular than Kennedy, Kerry and Patrick combined.          

by HGM MA on Sat May 17, 2008 at 09:31:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Abusive language is abusive! duh. (none / 0)

A person can use language in an abusive way.  A person can use their hands in an abusive way.  A person can use their money in an abusive way. A person can use their power in an abusive way.  All kinds of abuse are still abuse, even it they are not flesh on flesh. You seem to be suggesting you don't know this. I'm not going to pretend that I don't.

Virtual abuse happens when a person who has relationships in virtual reality is abusive there.  They can cause hurt and harm, intended to restrain or intimidate people who say things that they do not want to hear.  They can gang up on a person and spew hate and hurt in virtual reality, even when the intended victim can easily leave.

Just because it is abuse easily escaped from doesn't change the fact of the abusive behaviour, the intended harm or the harm done by the choice of the bully. Some think being on the internet or being anonymous frees a person from the responsibilities for their behaviour.  Or else we would not see such grossly inappropriate behaviour on the "progressive blogs", for instance.

It is much like kids spending all their free time for 6 out of their first 12 years playing violent video games.  When they get out in the world it is more difficult for them to understand the real effects and consequences of choosing violence as a behaviour, in war or in life, till it is too late.A lot of young returning veterans are having serious difficulties coping with the difference in their anticipated and real war experience.

Unchecked boundaries and unleashed anti-social behaviour on the internets are not good for a functioning society and don't encourage the formation of a whole, functioning person. That's why we need standards, boundaries and restraint.

About Merino controlling the AA vote in Hyde Park and Mattapan:  what about Roxbury, Dorchester, parts of South End, and surrounding towns,etc, and Clinton walked away with Cambridge?  Of the 480,000 some odd AAs living in MA, Obama seems to have gotten about 50,000 of them to vote for him.  He won Suffolk, Hampshire. Franklin, Dukes and Nantucket counties but he won them by a total of about 8000 votes, or just by a little.  I think we are missing something important by just dismissing his loss to the Merino machine. But I won't go back and forth about Massachusetts' demographics and politics. I used to live in Cambridge. Don't think that gets us anywhere.  

 But I think we are missing a lot on this site by not having a full dialogue about the very real problems with Obama's candidacy and his, and the party's vulnerabilities in this election. And I especially object to posters using abusive tactics to shut those explorations down and prevent or dismiss concerns we should be actively exploring.  We have our best chance in many decades to elect a democrat easily, with the full support of the rank and file members who don't vote primaries but do vote general elections and usually think the primary process gave them a nominee they couldn't vote for.  And it turns out that she is also the person best equiped to do the job well that we have had in 50 years.

And we are about to lose bo the election and the qualified candidate it we don't look hard at the reality of the other candidate's qualifications and his electability.  I always think we are in trouble if tactics are being applied by some to try to stop others from raising and  examining the problems and to try to force us to stop counting and acknowledging the votes.


by itsadryheat on Sun May 25, 2008 at 03:25:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (none / 0)

No one told me to tamp anything down.  I have done my best to criticize Obama supporters when I've seen inappropriateness.  This is not something I am just coming too, it has to do with how I believe people should act towards one another in spite of what candidate they are advocating for.  As I said, I would never tell anyone how to vote--that is way too personal.  I just hope we can come together over issues that concern all of us.  Win or lose this election.  That's all.


by mady on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:23:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 3)

You act as though there has never been any similar vitriol directed at us Obama supporters.

I resent being called a sexist, ignorant, elitist robot who views my candidate as the messiah, because I am none of those things.

Yet despite having been called all of these things by her supporters, I would still vote for Hillary in the GE were she the nominee, because I understand that the ending of the Iraq war, reproductive freedom, universal healthcare, and a host of other issues are much more important than my feelings having been hurt by some internet tough-guy.


by doschi on Fri May 16, 2008 at 03:36:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 4)

this isn't about defecting, it's about not giving up until it's really over, until one candidate has conceded and the other one accepted.  I'd like everyone to be nice, but that won't change me into someone who wants her to give up, that's all.   And the whole idea is really funny.  If it's true it's daffy.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:20:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 1)

You're right.  It is not over in any official sense.  It is not about being "nice" though, I certainly have raised issues throughout the campaign where I strongly disagreed with her.  And it's not about making people vote for someone by being sweet to them, that is a sucky idea, pandering at its worst.  I like most of the Hillary supporters here, and I understand the anger.  I would rather not feel like this is an armed camp, that's all.  It feels wrong, just feels wrong.


by mady on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:29:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 1)

You're okay Mady, it's a warning diary to Barack, make nice all you want, but don't think that'll make us defect. We want to go to Denver, we're  not tired and irritated, we've having fun. this is Democracy, this could be the most important race of my lifetime. We need a candidate that can win the GE, hands down.  It's that important. I like Barack fine, but I'm fighting for Hillary all the way.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:42:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (none / 0)

As I said, you are right. That's as it should be.


by mady on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:53:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Going on (2.00 / 1)

"I don't think anyone has the right to tell any candidate or their supporters to quit..."

Sorry, but I disagree on this.  Folks have a right to tell a candidate/supporters to quit and said candidate/suppoters have a right not to take that "advice".


by alb on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:38:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

can you provide a link to the claim you repeat? (2.00 / 4)

the claim you cite about 400 bloggers doesn't link to any article.  

Rather your link goes to a blog, but that blog itself doesn't link any article, rather it links to another blog, which lastly doesn't link to anything.

it's triple hearsay.

if this all around the net, go ahead and post another link or site.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:18:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: can you provide a link to the (2.00 / 4)

the claim is that there is a rumor, and the links are to the rumor. she didn't make up a rumor, there is one.  


by anna shane on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:21:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: can you provide a link to the (2.00 / 1)

That's how misinformation campaigns work.


Unable to rec or rate. But I've got phantom mojos for miles.
by Agent77 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:23:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: can you provide a link to the (2.00 / 1)

And why are we concerned with rumors?  We all know the one about Clinton and Vince Foster...


by rfahey22 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:24:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Rumors shouldn't be presented as fact (2.00 / 1)

and if you are going to present them as fact, then I'm going to present them too;

http://mediamatters.org/items/2007121800 12


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:26:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

oh. so there's nothing to it. okay. (2.00 / 1)


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:29:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Repeat? (2.00 / 1)

Sorry to break it to you, but she does not have the poular votre lead. Maybe in Hillaryland she does, but down here in Reality she does not.

Illegal contests in MI and Florida don't count, PR dosen't count, and caucus states (ya know - ones that actually COUNT in Novemeber, unlike Puerto Rico????) DO count.


by Deano963 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 12:23:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Just so you're clear about BS "unity" (1.66 / 3)

I have no intention of "making nice" with the exceedingly small MINORITY of denizens at blogs like this, taylormarsh, hillaryis44 etc. who have not behaved as Democrats.  

As far as I'm concerned people who have spent six months spreading lies, smears and attacks on a fellow Democrat more disgusting and unrelenting than has ever been seen at the sewers that are LGF or Freerepublic are NOT WELCOME in the Democratic party.  

The sooner Taylor Marsh (or any contributor to her cesspool) or Susan Hu or Texas Darlin' or any other mouth frothers leave the Democratic party the better.  If there were a way to force them out of the party I'd be all for it.

For the record, I haven't seen what many of your past diaries were like but you seem to be generally earnestly FOR Hillary rather than against Obama, but maybe that wasn't always the case.  


by ThisPlaceIsCrazy on Fri May 16, 2008 at 03:03:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

WONDERFUL DIARY!!!!!!!!!!1 (2.00 / 1)

Your diaries are always from the heart!   And they always include helpful information too!  Great job!   I honestly hope they make you a front pager!   I have mentioned before that I am more of a reader here than a writer,  and I always look for your excellent diaries!   Keep it up.  This is worth fighting for!!!


Hillary/Obama 2008
by Sandy1938 on Fri May 16, 2008 at 06:52:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Alegre, it's fine to fight with your candidate. (2.00 / 1)

Fight all the way.  But if she does not prevail< I know she will endorse Obama.

At that point, if it happens, I think that forgetting the past and working to elect the nominee is the right way.  That has been my experience.

BOTH sides in the Clinton/Obama wars said things they should not have on blogs, just as some Obama and Clinton supporters trashed John Edwards and me, personally, for advocating for Edwards.  

Nonetheless, I have let go of it.    

If Senator Clinton tells her supporters to support Obama, they will.  Until she does, sure, get out and fight for her.  If she wins the nomination, which appears to be a long shot, but if she does, I'll proudly support her.

But if Obama is nominated, which appears more likely, I have no doubt you will follow Hillary Clinton when she asks for unity.

Whether you chose to return to Daily Kos is up to you and not all that important.  There are many blogs.   I have encouraged a few Obama supporters to reach out to you personally if Clinton endorses Obama.  But that's your call.  I just want unity for the general election.

I believe in unity and defeating McCain.

My candidate dropped out in January.  I still prefer him by a lot to either Obama or Clinton, but it was not to be.

I am a Democrat.  The only way we will make the changes we need is to grow the Democratic Party and make it more progressive.  

Letting go of the past is essential to unity.  There will be another day for all of us.  


by